279 Views
Given the political and highly contestable nature of the Ayodhya conflict, the November 9 unanimous verdict by a five-judge constitution bench, consisting of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, CJI-designate S.A. Bobde and Justices D.Y. Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer, has expectedly generated contrasting opinions. The court decided that five acres would be given to the construction of a mosque at a "prominent site" in Ayodhya and that the full 2.77 acres of contested land in Ayodhya would be given to a trust that would be established for the construction of the Ram temple there.
314 Views
Arbitration is an ADR system that provides a mechanism for resolving many disputes in an outside environment the courtroom. The dispute will be resolved by a panel of several arbitrators, an arbitral tribunal, or even just one single arbitrator who renders his/her own decision in the form of an award. A ruling made by an arbitrator is always final and can be very easily enforced in the court.
307 Views
India has accepted the secularism guaranteed by the Constitution in order to preserve and honor the traditions and legacy of all religions. But different people have different ideas and viewpoints, which leads to societal turmoil and violence in the end. Some arguments are so persistent that a judicial trial is necessary.
The Ayodhya Controversy Case, also known as M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs v Mahant Suresh Das & ors, gave rise to one such dispute. You could also catch the song and slogan "Mandir wahi banayenge" in your community.
