Quashing Of Divorce Case On Cruelty Filed By Wife 91-8877001993

The misuse of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which punishes cruelty committed by a husband or his family members against a married woman along with her spouse and parents, has drawn attention from the highest court. The Bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and N Kotiswar Singh respectively dismissed such cruelty case filed under Section 498A IPC against husband and his parents by effectively stating that the wife used this section as a means of expressing her personal grudge against the husband and his family. 

Background of the Case

• In the case of Dara Lakshmi Narayana vs State of Telangana, marriage between the husband and wife occurred in the year 2015 by performing the Hindu rites and rituals.
• After filing a petition with the court seeking for the dissolution of the marriage or divorce, the wife had registered a case of domestic cruelty against her husband and in-laws.
• The wife’s family made a complaint against the husband’s family under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (i.e. cruelty by husband or his relatives) and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Act (demanding dowry and accepting dowry).
• The aggrieved persons preferred a writ petition before the High Court under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the FIR, in light of the referred criminal proceedings pending against the accused persons. 
• The High Court refused to stop the criminal proceedings in the contested order and instructed the investigating officer to adhere to the obligatory procedure outlined in Section 41A of the CrPC and it is also the guideline specified by this Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273. The accused have moved the appeal against the same. 

Observation by the Court

• This growing trend has been commented upon by the Court that as using Section 498A as a weapon for unleashing personal vendetta against husband and in-laws by women has become increasingly popular.
• A personal vendetta against the husband and his family through provisions like Section 498A of IPC by a woman has become the emerging trend, especially in recent years, with such an alarming rise in matrimonial disputes across the country coupled with increasing acrimony and tension within the institution of marriage. 
• Moreover, this personal vendetta is expressed through vague and over-generalized allegations during matrimonial conflict, which in turn leads to the misuse of legal process, giving rise to the possibility of cruelty tactics from the wife and/or her family.

Role of High Courts in Quashing Divorce Cases

High courts exercise their inherent powers, such as under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and assume a significant role while quashing legal proceedings. These powers are always exercised to prevent any kind of misuse of the judicial process, although they cannot be denied even in the case of matrimonial matters due to extremely compelling and exceptional conditions. With regard to the factors determining the quashing of divorce proceedings, the following considerations will take into account before making a decision.

• The nature and gravity of the allegations.
• The evidence produced by both parties.
• The chances of an amicable settlement.
• The possibility of abuse of the process of law.
• Evidence and Documentation in Cruelty Cases

More than almost anything else, evidence is crucial in divorce cases founded on cruelty. The petitioner must generally bring:

• If physical abuse is alleged, medical reports.
• Witness testimonies from family, friends, or colleagues.
• Audio, video, or written documents of abusive behaviour.
• Any other documents supporting the claim of cruelty.

Thus, crucial for the respondent who is contesting the case is rebutting or demonstrating the inadmissibility of these pieces of evidence by counter-evidence.

A careful balance must be struck between defending the petitioner's rights and avoiding abuse of the legal system when a divorce case is dismissed for cruelty. In such cases, the values of justice, equity, and fairness serve as the courts' compass. Seeking expert legal counsel and looking into options for a cooperative settlement can frequently result in better results for both parties than protracted litigation.

In the end, the goal should continue to be to ensure that justice is done while causing the least amount of financial and emotional hardship to everyone concerned.

Sharks of Law offers a comprehensive legal solutions facility, providing an extensive collection of information on diverse areas of law and current developments in the legal field by the best professionals in this area. With this law firm, you can search and find a lawyer who can meet your legal requirements for online consultation. The attorneys at Sharks of Law have the necessary expertise across all the fields involved should you have any inquiries that require legal counsel.

Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com

Help Desk:-+91-88770-01993