The legal community in India has flared up against the proposed amendments to the Advocates Act 1961, as they raised concerns regarding the adverse impact on lawyers' rights and individual independence. The Bar Council of India (BCI) vehemently opposed these amendments, declaring them anti-lawyer and attempts to stifle the independence of the legal profession. The amendments, specifically Section 35A and Section 45B, are seen to be attempts to criminalize the actions of lawyers and infringe upon their fundamental rights. As a result, this uprising has gained national attention with professionals from the legal community demanding that these changes be withdrawn at once by the Law Ministry of India under Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal.
Reason for Protest
The legal community remained adamant about some reasons, pointing to the proposed amendment bill as an affront to the profession. Major issues driving this widespread protest include:
Criminalization of Lawyers' Professional Conduct:
- One of the most controversial provisions in the amendment bill is Section 35A, which proposes penalties so vague that they are termed "Advocate Misconduct." As defined, the section permits authorities to inflict firm disciplinary action on lawyers by overriding their professional rights and lead to criminalization of conduct. The vagueness regarding the definition of advocate misconduct gives rise to a fear that this provision could be put to misuse against lawyers who represent against powerful persons, therefore compromising the independence of legal professionals.
- Section 45B introduces criminal liability for actions deemed as obstruction of justice by lawyers. The provision is seen as a direct attack on lawyers' rights as it gives authorities power to penalize advocates for their courtroom conduct. Bar Council of India argues that these sections are used as a tool for intimidating lawyers and depressing their ability to represent their clients effectively.
Violation of Fundamental Rights:
- The proposed amendments infringe on the fundamental rights of advocates, namely Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to practice any profession. Through stark penalties and vague definitions of misconduct, the government, by all means, is holding the right to practice unrestricted influence upon advocates.
- Moreover, the provisions offended the principles of natural justice by allowing arbitrary actions of the authorities against advocates without a chance of a fair hearing. The legal community has termed this an unjust assault on freedom with an affront against constitutional protections.
Undermining the Bar Council of India’s Authority:
- The Bar Council of India is an autonomous body that regulates the profession of law in India. The proposed amendment bill seeks to transfer disciplinary power to other regulatory authorities. This move is seen as an attempt to compromise the autonomy of both the Bar Council and the legal profession directly subject to government control.
- The Bar Council stands unwavering in its opposition to the move, as this would destroy the independence of the legal profession and incite unnecessary political interference. Lawyers fear their ability to take cases, especially involving government agencies and important personalities, will be grossly undermined.
Attack on Advocates Role in the Justice System:
- Advocates act as intermediaries between the legal service provided to citizens and justice delivery therein. The introduction of such harsh provisions against advocates ushered in a fear complex among lawyers; thus, they will be less inclined to take on cases against the interests of the status quo.
- The Law Ministry, under Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal has defended the amendments by saying that they are essential for creating discipline within the profession. However, the legal community argues that the existing provisions in the Advocates Act 1961 are already sufficient for disciplining any misconduct. Thus, the new amendments are viewed as unwanted and anti-lawyer and meant to undermine the independence of legal practitioners rather than improve the profession.
Threat to Access to Justice:
- By imposing such burdensome restrictions and penalties upon lawyers, the amendment bill also indirectly affects the common citizens who rely on these legal practitioners for their justice. If lawyers were kept perpetually under the threat of punitive action, then lawyers would hesitate to take up sensitive cases where government authorities, corporate big shots, or influential people are involved.
- The legal fraternity warns that these amendments may very well deter the representation of their clients in cases which could put them against very powerful entities and corporates. The justice system will be rendered crippled, if not decimated, in denying access to genuine fair legal representation for ordinary citizens.
Nationwide Protest and Demands
As a response to the proposed amendments, lawyers in the country protested, boycotting court sittings and organizing demonstrations. The Bar Council of India leads the opposition, demanding immediate withdrawal of the bill. Lawyers' associations across several states have supported the movement by declaring that the legal profession must maintain its independence from unnecessary governmental interference.
The primary demands from the protesters are:
- The full withdrawal of Section 35A and Section 45B, which are used to harass and intimidate them.
- The restoration of the Bar Council of India powers of independent regulation of the legal profession without political interference.
- The enshrinement of the fundamental rights of lawyers to practice their profession without arbitrary criminalization.
- Transparency in legal reforms, ensuring that any modifications to the Advocates Act 1961 are performed based on a thorough consultation with the legal community.
The protests have put a heavy burden on the Law Ministry and Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal to rethink the amendments. Though the government has indicated possible discussion with legal representatives, the legal community is clear and firm in its demand for a complete withdrawal of the amendments.
For the time being, the legal community is united against what they consider an anti-lawyers move that undermines the core tenets of justice, fair play, and professional independence. It's not the end and the follow-up days will unravel whether the government will heed the Bar Council of India and withdraw the controversial amendments.
Sharks of Law offers a comprehensive legal solutions facility, providing an extensive collection of information on diverse areas of law in the legal field by the best professionals in this area. With this law firm, you can search and find a lawyer who can meet your legal requirements for online consultation. The attorneys at Sharks of Law have the necessary expertise across all the fields involved should you have any inquiries that require legal counsel.
Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com
Help Desk:-+91-88770-01993
